Lumbar spinal stenosis is a narrowing of the space around the nerves in the lower spine, usually due to age-related arthritis. It commonly causes back and leg symptoms that ease when leaning forward or sitting.

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a narrowing of the space around the spinal cord and nerves in the lower back. It most often develops with age, as arthritis of the spinal joints, thickening of ligaments and the settling of worn discs gradually crowd the space available for the nerves. The result is often back pain together with aching, burning or heaviness in the legs.

A characteristic feature is that symptoms are posture-dependent: standing tall and walking tend to bring them on, while leaning forward or sitting eases them. Many people notice their walking distance is limited, but that they can manage tasks that involve bending forward, such as pushing a trolley, more comfortably.

Our role is to assess your symptoms, confirm the pattern and check for anything that needs further investigation, then help you with a practical plan. The focus is on keeping you as active and comfortable as possible — through movement, physiotherapy and pain management — and being clear about the point at which a surgical opinion becomes worthwhile.

Common symptoms

  • Aching or burning pain in the buttocks or legs, often brought on by walking or standing
  • Relief of leg symptoms when leaning forward or sitting down
  • Numbness, tingling or heaviness in the legs with activity
  • Reduced walking distance before symptoms build up
Evidence-informed treatment summary

How our treatment options may fit for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

The options below include the treatments offered at The Back Pain Doctor. Listing a treatment does not mean it is recommended for this condition. The evidence, likely benefit and role of each option are considered against the diagnosis, examination findings, imaging where appropriate, patient goals, risks, cost and alternatives.

Foundation

Diagnosis, education and progressive rehabilitation

This is the starting point for most musculoskeletal conditions.

The priority is to identify the likely pain generator, explain the condition clearly, modify aggravating load and build a realistic plan to restore strength, movement and confidence.

Evidence is condition-specific; it is not a universal pain treatment.

Shockwave is best framed as an adjunct where the diagnosis fits. It is generally more established for selected tendon and plantar heel pain presentations than for many joint or nerve conditions.

Read more

Evidence varies substantially by condition, tissue and preparation method.

PRP may be discussed in selected tendon or joint presentations. It should not be presented as a guaranteed regenerative treatment, and uncertainty, cost and alternatives should be discussed.

Read more

Best used for specific inflammatory or irritable pain generators, usually for short-term relief.

An injection may help when a joint, bursa, tendon sheath or other defined structure is driving symptoms. It is not a cure and needs to be weighed against risks, recurrence and the need for rehabilitation.

Read more

Clinical evidence is still developing and guideline support is limited.

EMTT may be discussed as an adjunct in selected presentations, but should be presented with clear uncertainty and never as a replacement for diagnosis, load management or rehabilitation.

Read more
Selected cases

Prolotherapy

Evidence is condition-specific and generally less established than exercise-based care.

Prolotherapy may be considered in carefully selected chronic ligament, tendon or joint-related pain presentations, but it is not a first-line treatment.

Read more

Most relevant when focal myofascial pain is a clear contributor.

Trigger point treatment may reduce pain from focal muscle spasm or myofascial tenderness. It should be paired with movement restoration, strength work and recurrence prevention.

Read more

Relevant only when the history and examination support nerve irritation or entrapment.

Nerve-focused treatment may be discussed when there is a plausible peripheral nerve pain generator. Progressive weakness, major neurological deficit or red flags require a different pathway.

Read more

This is general information only. Suitability is assessed individually. Treatments with limited or condition-dependent evidence may still be discussed, but only with clear explanation of uncertainty, expected benefit, risks, cost and alternatives. Red flags, progressive neurological symptoms or suspected serious pathology require a different pathway.

Frequently asked questions

Why do my legs feel better when I lean forward?
Leaning forward or sitting opens up the space around the nerves in the spinal canal, which relieves pressure. Many people find they can walk more comfortably leaning on a trolley, or ride a stationary bike, while walking upright brings symptoms on.
Can non-surgical treatment help?
Non-surgical measures do not widen the canal, but many people find their symptoms and walking tolerance improve with the right combination of activity, physiotherapy and pain management.
When is surgery considered?
Surgery is generally reserved for people whose walking and quality of life are significantly limited despite non-surgical care. We help you weigh this up and refer for a surgical opinion when it is genuinely indicated.

Ready for a clearer plan for your back or musculoskeletal pain?

Book an assessment with Dr Joshua Hatch.

Your assessment focuses on understanding the likely source of your pain and the most appropriate non-surgical options for your diagnosis, with the aim of reducing pain and improving function.

Book an appointment
Book an appointment with the Back Pain Doctor