Back Pain Doctor
Cervical Spondylosis (Neck Arthritis)
Cervical spondylosis — commonly called arthritis of the neck — is the medical term for the age-related, wear-and-tear changes that occur in the neck over time. As the discs lose height and water content and the small facet joints develop arthritis, the body may form bone spurs, and range of movement can reduce. It is extremely common, affecting more than 85% of people over 60, though many have no noticeable symptoms.
When symptoms do occur, they are usually neck pain and stiffness — sometimes worse after holding the neck in one position for a while (driving, reading), and often eased by rest. Some people notice headaches, a grinding sensation on turning the neck, or muscle spasm. Less commonly, narrowing around the nerves or spinal cord can cause arm numbness, weakness or balance problems, which need assessment.
In most cases, cervical spondylosis responds well to conservative care. Our role is to assess your neck, check for any nerve involvement, and guide a practical plan — typically built around physiotherapy, movement and pain management, with other options considered where symptoms persist. We are clear about the uncommon situations in which further investigation or a specialist opinion is warranted.
Age-related neck changes are common in people without symptoms, so they do not by themselves explain a headache. Where headache is present and appears to track with the neck, see cervicogenic headache.
Common symptoms
- Neck pain and stiffness, ranging from mild to severe
- Pain worse after holding the neck in one position, such as driving or reading
- Grinding or popping sensation when turning the neck
- Headaches, or neck and shoulder muscle spasm
Commonly seen in
Evidence for twelve treatment options in cervical spondylosis (neck arthritis)
This is not a fixed ladder or a package of treatments. Every option is assessed independently against this diagnosis, including treatments with limited direct research that may still be reasonable for a clearly defined tissue target. The evidence level, likely benefit, risks, cost and alternatives are weighed at consultation.
Foundation — diagnosis, education and rehabilitation
The part of care with the broadest relevance. For many people it is enough on its own; other options are judged against it, not automatically added after it.
Diagnosis, education and progressive rehabilitation Working out what is driving the pain, explaining what your imaging does and does not mean, and building a graded loading plan you can actually follow. Core care
What it involves
Assessment to identify the likely pain source, an explanation of what the diagnosis means, adjustment of the loads that aggravate it, and a progressive strength and conditioning plan — with weight management where that is clinically relevant.
What the evidence shows
Exercise is the core treatment, and it performs as well as the tablets. A network meta-analysis of 152 randomised trials and 17,431 patients found exercise gave the same pain relief and functional improvement as oral anti-inflammatories and paracetamol, with a far better safety profile (Weng, Br J Sports Med 2023). EULAR (Moseng, Ann Rheum Dis 2024) and the American College of Rheumatology (Kolasinski, Arthritis Rheumatol 2020) both make exercise, education and weight management the core of non-pharmacological care. An individual-participant meta-analysis of 31 trials and 4,241 patients is honest about the size of it: the average effect is small and of questionable clinical importance, and those with more pain and worse function at the start benefit most (Holden, Lancet Rheumatol 2023).
Pairing reviewed 2026-09-02.
Where it fits for you
Worth being straight about: the average effect is modest, and it is larger for people who are struggling more to begin with. What it does have over the alternatives is that it is safe to keep doing, and it works on the things a joint injection cannot — strength, capacity and weight.
Muscle and symptom-modifying options
Useful only when the examination identifies the tissue they target or when short-term pain control creates a useful rehabilitation window.
Wet needling and trigger point injection (trigger point injection) A fine needle into a tender band of muscle, with a small volume of dilute glucose solution injected through it. Worth discussing
What it involves
The needle is placed into the tender muscle band and a small volume of 5% glucose with 0.02-0.08% lignocaine is injected. Often done in the same visit as your assessment, and usable where the tender area sits deeper. Dry needling — the same technique with nothing injected — is not offered here.
What the evidence shows
For myofascial pain, trigger point injection performed as well as shockwave in head-to-head comparison — a meta-analysis of 10 trials found shockwave better than sham and ultrasound but NO better than trigger point injection, dry needling or laser (Zhang, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2020). Trials of needling in myofascial pain are small and generally low quality.
Pairing reviewed 2026-08-30.
Where it fits for you
Directed at a tender muscle band that reproduces part of your pain, alongside the loading work. Not a treatment for the joint, disc or nerve itself.
Ultrasound-guided injections Guidance means we can see the needle reach the target. What goes into the needle depends on the diagnosis. Good support
What it involves
The injection is performed under ultrasound so the needle can be watched into the target structure. What is injected is decided by the diagnosis — and corticosteroid is used sparingly, for the reasons set out below.
What the evidence shows
Ultrasound improves needle-placement accuracy, but guidance is not a treatment in itself: benefit depends on a valid injectable target and what is injected. Condition reviewed: cervical spondylosis.
Evidence source: Oo et al., ultrasound-guided injection systematic review (2024)
Pairing reviewed 2026-08-30.
Where it fits for you
For cervical spondylosis, an ultrasound-guided injection is considered only when there is a specific diagnostic question or a separate joint, bursa, sheath or nerve target. The injectate and purpose are stated before treatment.
V-ACTOR vibration therapy (vibration therapy) Low-frequency vibration applied over tender muscle. Not a shockwave, despite sharing the machine. Plausible — no studies
What it involves
A vibration handpiece is moved over the tender muscle and fascia for a few minutes. It runs from the same STORZ MASTERPULS icon console as radial shockwave but is a separate handpiece delivering a different, gentler form of energy. No needles, no anaesthetic, no downtime.
What the evidence shows
No published clinical trial of this device in this condition. It is a vibration handpiece delivered from the same console as radial shockwave, and the rationale is myofascial rather than tendon- or bone-directed.
Pairing reviewed 2026-08-30.
Where it fits for you
A comfort measure used within a session where muscular tightness is limiting movement. Never the reason for the appointment, and not a substitute for the treatments that do have evidence.
Energy-based treatment options
Radial pressure wave, focused shockwave and EMTT have different targets and different evidence. They are assessed separately rather than treated as one category.
Radial or focused shockwave? Read the overviewRadial shockwave (radial pressure wave) Broad treatment across tender muscle and fascia, close to the surface. Worth discussing
What it involves
A handpiece is moved over the tender tissue while ballistic pressure pulses are delivered, using a transmitter head chosen for the tissue — including heads shaped for fascia and for the muscle either side of the spine. The pulse is strongest at the skin and weakens with depth, so this is mainly a myofascial treatment, though it can reach deeper in some areas. No anaesthetic, no downtime, usually a course of sessions about a week apart.
What the evidence shows
For myofascial pain, a meta-analysis of 8 controlled studies (571 patients, mostly neck and upper back) found shockwave reduced pain and improved pain threshold and neck disability compared with other methods (Wu, Ann Transl Med 2021). A second meta-analysis of 10 trials found it better than sham and ultrasound, but NO better than dry needling, trigger point injection or laser (Zhang, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2020).
Pairing reviewed 2026-08-30.
Where it fits for you
Directed at a tender muscle contributing to the pain, not at the disc, joint or nerve. No better than needling in head-to-head trials, so the choice is about what suits you.
Focused shockwave (ESWT) A true shock wave converging at depth — for tendon, joint, ligament and bone. Plausible — no studies
What it involves
A focused system generates an acoustic shock wave that converges at a focal point set at a defined depth, concentrating the energy where the target is. This is the form we use for tendon, joint, ligament and bone. Typically four to six sessions about a week apart, no anaesthetic and no formal downtime.
What the evidence shows
The osteoarthritis evidence for shockwave is in the KNEE (Silva, Clin Rehabil 2022; Liao, Clin Rehabil 2019). There is no trial evidence at this joint.
Pairing reviewed 2026-08-30.
Where it fits for you
Reasonable to consider on the same mechanism, with the gap stated. Not a substitute for the loading and weight-management work that has the better evidence in arthritis generally.
EMTT (magnetotransduction therapy) High-energy magnetic pulses applied over the area. Painless, no contact. Plausible — no studies
What it involves
You sit with the applicator positioned over the area for a short session. Painless, no gel or contact required, and usually delivered as a course — commonly alongside shockwave.
What the evidence shows
There are no published randomised trials of EMTT in this condition, or in any musculoskeletal condition, that we can point to. The supporting work is laboratory work: EMTT increased tenocyte proliferation, migration and collagen expression in cultured human tendon cells (Mancini, Int J Mol Sci 2025). The nearest human evidence for a related electromagnetic therapy is negative — a randomised trial of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy added to eccentric exercise for Achilles tendinopathy found no improvement in outcome scores or tendon neovascularity over eccentric exercise alone (Ko, Orthop J Sports Med 2024).
Pairing reviewed 2026-08-30.
Where it fits for you
Offered only as an adjunct alongside treatment that does have evidence, never as the plan itself, and only after that gap is explained. Much of the EMTT literature is manufacturer-affiliated, which is part of why we describe it this way.
Biologic and joint injection options
Each injection is assessed independently for the named diagnosis. Cost, uncertainty, likely benefit, risks and alternatives are part of the decision.
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) Your own blood, concentrated and injected under ultrasound guidance. Worth discussing
What it involves
Blood is taken from your arm, spun to concentrate the platelets, and injected into the target under ultrasound guidance in the same appointment.
What the evidence shows
There is now one randomised trial. Forty people with cervical facet-mediated pain received either leucocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma or corticosteroid into the facet joint under fluoroscopy. Over six months the two were similar for pain intensity; both improved at one month; the platelet-rich plasma group had a clinically meaningful fall in pain at that point, a larger gain in pain self-efficacy, and less pain during the procedure itself (Allison, Reg Anesth Pain Med 2026). A prospective series of 42 people with chronic whiplash-associated facet pain reported improvement sustained at twelve months, but had no control group and gave rehabilitation alongside (Smith, Clin Pract 2025). Across nine randomised trials of epidural rather than intra-articular injection, a 2026 review graded the evidence fair, Level III, with a moderate effect (Manchikanti, Curr Pain Headache Rep 2026).
Pairing reviewed 2026-09-04.
Where it fits for you
Not done in this clinic — a cervical facet injection should be performed under CT guidance, with the facet joints confirmed as the source by diagnostic blocks first, so this is a referral rather than something we provide. For degenerative neck pain the evidence sits with exercise, load management and understanding the problem, and that is where we start; this becomes a conversation only for pain that has run for months and points clearly at the facet joints.
Prolotherapy (dextrose) A course of dextrose injections into and around the structure and its attachments. Evidence mixed
What it involves
Hypertonic dextrose is injected at the tender ligament and tendon attachments, and into the joint where relevant, usually as a series of treatments a few weeks apart.
What the evidence shows
No direct controlled trial establishing prolotherapy for this diagnosis was identified. The broader connective-tissue review found insufficient evidence overall, with substantial variation by site and comparator. Condition reviewed: cervical spondylosis.
Evidence source: Sit et al., dextrose prolotherapy systematic review (2020)
Pairing reviewed 2026-08-30.
Where it fits for you
For cervical spondylosis, prolotherapy may be discussed for persistent connective-tissue pain after standard care, with the absence of direct evidence and the alternatives made explicit.
Viscosupplementation (hyaluronic acid) A gel-like injection into an arthritic joint. Widely used, and genuinely contested. Evidence mixed
What it involves
One or a short series of hyaluronic acid injections into the joint under ultrasound guidance.
What the evidence shows
Hyaluronic acid evidence is concentrated in osteoarthritis—especially the knee—and remains contested; it cannot be extrapolated to a non-arthritic tissue or a different diagnosis. Condition reviewed: cervical spondylosis.
Evidence source: Pereira et al., large-trial injection review (2024)
Pairing reviewed 2026-08-30.
Where it fits for you
For cervical spondylosis, this is relevant only when a symptomatic arthritic peripheral joint is the actual target. It is not used for muscle, tendon, ligament, nerve, fracture or spinal pathology.
Nerve-targeted options
Relevant when examination identifies a superficial neuropathic pattern or a compressed peripheral nerve—not simply because pain is present.
Lyftogt perineural therapy (perineural injection therapy) A series of small dilute dextrose injections just under the skin, over tender superficial nerves. Only if relevant
What it involves
Small injections of low-concentration dextrose, usually 5%, placed just beneath the skin along tender superficial nerves. Given as a series of short sessions.
What the evidence shows
Perineural dextrose evidence is concentrated in diagnosed peripheral compression neuropathies, particularly the upper limb; no direct evidence was identified for this diagnosis itself. Condition reviewed: cervical spondylosis.
Evidence source: Perineural dextrose for upper-limb entrapment neuropathy review (2025)
Pairing reviewed 2026-08-30.
Where it fits for you
For cervical spondylosis, perineural treatment may be considered only if a separate superficial neuropathic pain pattern is found on examination. It is not treatment of the primary diagnosis.
Ultrasound-guided nerve hydrodissection Fluid placed around a nerve to free it from the surrounding tissue. Only if relevant
What it involves
Under ultrasound, fluid is placed in the plane around the nerve to separate it from the tissue that is tethering or compressing it.
What the evidence shows
Hydrodissection evidence is concentrated in ultrasound-confirmed peripheral nerve entrapment, especially carpal tunnel syndrome; no direct evidence was identified for this diagnosis itself. Condition reviewed: cervical spondylosis.
Evidence source: Buntragulpoontawee et al., hydrodissection injectate review (2021)
Pairing reviewed 2026-08-30.
Where it fits for you
For cervical spondylosis, hydrodissection may be considered only if ultrasound and examination identify a separate compressed or tethered peripheral nerve. It is not treatment of the primary diagnosis.
This is general information only and suitability is assessed individually. Treatments with limited or condition-dependent evidence may still be discussed, but only with clear explanation of the uncertainty, the expected benefit, risks, cost and alternatives. Red flags, progressive neurological symptoms or suspected serious pathology require a different pathway.
Every treatment above is described in full on the non-surgical treatments page, including what each one is used for and what the evidence supports. Ratings apply to the named diagnosis; an adjacent muscle, tendon, joint or nerve problem is assessed as a separate target.
Corticosteroid injection is reviewed separately for each diagnosis.
Cortisone reliably reduces pain in the short term, and that can be genuinely useful when pain is stopping you sleeping or moving enough to rehabilitate. Beyond that window the picture changes. Evidence in tendon problems suggests early relief can be followed by worse outcomes at a year than exercise alone, and repeated injections into a joint have been associated with cartilage loss. It does not repair anything.
So we do not build treatment plans around it. Where an injection is the right call, we review the specific diagnosis and target, discuss what is being injected and why, keep the number low, and pair it with the loading work that changes the longer-term course.
When we would still consider it
- Pain severe enough to block rehabilitation
- A clear inflammatory or bursal target on imaging
- A specific short-term goal — a trip, a procedure, a return to work
- Diagnostic use, where the response tells us where the pain is coming from
When a cortisone injection is worth doing, and when it is not
Other neck conditions
Pain in the same area can come from more than one source, and the label matters less than what the examination and history point to. These are the other guides for this region.
Frequently asked questions
Is cervical spondylosis serious?
When should I be concerned?
Will I need surgery?
Ready for a clearer plan for your back or musculoskeletal pain?
Book an assessment with Dr Joshua Hatch.
Your assessment focuses on understanding the likely source of your pain and the most appropriate non-surgical options for your diagnosis, with the aim of reducing pain and improving function.
Book an appointment